OpenAI has officially signaled a shift from single-agent models to an Autonomous Team Model. With the launch of the GPT-5.3 Codex preview, the focus is now on how specialized agents coordinate to solve complex engineering challenges.

To explore this new paradigm, I've built the OpenAI Autonomous Team Model framework. This project simulates a multi-agent orchestration layer where specialized agents—Architect, Developer, and Reviewer—collaborate on tasks with high-fidelity handoffs and consensus-driven quality gates.

The Team Structure​

The framework implements three core roles:

1. Architect Agent: Responsible for high-level system design and interface definitions.
2. Developer Agent: Translates architectural plans into implementation logic.
3. Reviewer Agent: Audits the implementation for security, performance, and style.

Autonomous Sprint Workflow​

Instead of a single prompt-response cycle, the team runs a "sprint":

• The Architect analyzes the requirement and produces a structured plan.
• The Developer receives the requirement and the Architect's plan as context to generate code.
• The Reviewer audits the final output against the original requirement and implementation.

This multi-step process significantly reduces hallucination and improves the reliability of autonomous code generation in GPT-5.3's massive context window.

View Code

Note: This is an experimental simulation of modern agentic workflows inspired by the latest GPT-5.3 Codex capabilities.

For over a decade, Drupal developers have relied on Drupal.ajax—a powerful but heavy abstraction layer over jQuery—to handle dynamic interactions. But with jQuery's slow sunset and the rise of "HTML-over-the-wire" paradigms, it's time for a change.

Enter the HTMX in Drupal Core initiative.

There is a fascinating conversation happening in the Drupal community right now: HTMX Now in Drupal Core. The proposal? To replace the venerable (but aging) jQuery-based Ajax API with a modern, lightweight, HTML-over-the-wire subsystem based on HTMX.

To understand the practical implications, I built a demo module comparing the two approaches side-by-side.

The Experiment​

I created drupal-htmx-ajax-replacement-demo, a module that renders two identical interactive cards. One uses the standard Drupal.ajax library, and the other uses HTMX.

1. Legacy Drupal Ajax​

The traditional way relies on jQuery and a custom JSON protocol.

The Flow:

1. Client clicks a link with .use-ajax.
2. Drupal.ajax intercepts the click.
3. Server builds an AjaxResponse with commands (e.g., ReplaceCommand).
4. Server returns JSON: [{"command": "insert", "method": "html", ...}].
5. Client Javascript parses JSON and executes DOM manipulation.

The Code:

public function timeAjax() {
  $response = new AjaxResponse();
  $response->addCommand(new HtmlCommand('#container', $html));
  return $response;
}

2. The HTMX Way​

HTMX allows us to be declarative. We define what we want in HTML attributes, and the server just returns HTML.

The Flow:

1. Client clicks <button hx-get="..." hx-target="...">.
2. HTMX intercepts.
3. Server returns standard HTML fragment.
4. HTMX swaps the HTML into the target.

The Code:

public function time() {
  return new Response($html);
}

Why This Matters​

The difference in complexity is striking.

• Javascript: The legacy approach requires the heavy core/drupal.ajax library (and jQuery). HTMX is lighter and requires no custom Javascript for this interaction.
• Backend: The HTMX controller returns a simple Response object with a string. The legacy controller requires instantiating AjaxResponse and learning the Command API.

You can view the full source code and the comparative implementation in the repository below.

View Code

View Code

qodo-multi-agent-code-review-demo is a Python-based simulator that demonstrates the multi-agent architecture recently introduced by Qodo (formerly CodiumAI). It showcases how specialized AI agents—focused on security, performance, style, and bugs—can collaborate to provide high-precision code reviews.

The project implements a ReviewCoordinator that orchestrates multiple domain-specific agents. Each agent uses targeted heuristics (representing specialized training) to identify issues and suggest fixes. By separating concerns into distinct agents, the system achieves better precision and recall than a single general-purpose model, mirroring the architecture behind Qodo 2.0.

A technical takeaway: multi-agent systems thrive on structured communication. Using a unified Finding model allows the coordinator to aggregate and prioritize feedback seamlessly, ensuring that critical security vulnerabilities aren't buried under style suggestions.

View Code​

View Code

WordPress 6.8 is set to introduce native support for the Speculation Rules API, a browser feature that allows sites to tell the browser which pages should be prefetched or prerendered before the user even clicks.

With WordPress 7.0 Beta 1 set for February 19, 2026, the ecosystem is bracing for one of the most significant releases in recent years. This version isn't just a number bump; it represents the convergence of Gutenberg Phase 3 (Collaboration) and the first steps into Phase 4 (Multilingual). To help developers prepare, I've updated my wp-7-release-readiness CLI scanner to detect more than just PHP versions.

What's New in the Scanner​

I've enhanced the tool to specifically target the upcoming core changes:

1. Phase 4 Multilingual Readiness: The scanner now detects popular multilingual plugins like Polylang and WPML. Since WP 7.0 is laying the groundwork for native multilingual support, identifying these plugins early helps teams plan for eventual core migrations.
2. Phase 3 Collaboration Audit: It checks for collaboration-heavy plugins (e.g., Edit Flow, Oasis Workflow). As WordPress 7.0 introduces real-time collaboration features, these plugins might become redundant or conflict with core's new capabilities.
3. PHP 8.2+ Recommendation: While PHP 7.4 remains the minimum, WordPress 7.0 highly recommends PHP 8.2 or 8.3 for optimal performance with the new collaboration engine. The tool now flags environments running older PHP 8.x versions as needing an update for the best experience.

Why Beta 1 Matters​

Beta 1 (Feb 19) is the "feature freeze" point. For developers, this is the time to start testing themes and plugins against the new core. The final release is expected in early April, giving us a tight 6-week window to ensure compatibility. Using a scanner like this allows for automated auditing across large multisite networks or agency portfolios before manually testing each site.

Technical Insight: Scanning for Conflict​

The plugin detection logic uses a simple but effective directory-based heuristic. By mapping known third-party solutions for multilingual and collaboration to their core-equivalent counterparts in 7.0, the tool provides a high-level "conflict risk" score. It's not just about what breaks; it's about what becomes native.

View Code

References​

• WordPress 7.0 Release Schedule
• Gutenberg Roadmap: Phase 3 & 4

Google just handed independent publishers a way to fight back against AI scraping with their "Preferred Sources" tool, while hackers are simultaneously punishing anyone who ignores their composer.lock with a massive new malware campaign.

Why I'm Watching This​

If you run a WordPress site in 2026, you're fighting a two-front war: visibility and integrity.

1. Visibility: AI Overviews often bury the original source. If you break a story or write the definitive guide, you want Google to know you are the primary source, not the AI summarizer.
2. Integrity: The "Widespread WordPress Malware Campaign" reported this week isn't sophisticated—it's just opportunistic. It targets the lazy.

I've been spending time this weekend auditing my sites against these two updates.

The Analysis​

Google's "Preferred Sources"​

According to the latest reports, this tool allows publishers to explicitly signal "original reporting" via structured data or Search Console configuration. It's effectively a canonical tag for facts.

Here is how the flow changes for content producers:

If you are a technical writer or news breaker, ignoring this means you are voluntarily feeding the model without getting the traffic credit.

The Malware Wave​

The report from Squared Tech highlights that this campaign specifically targets "outdated plugins." This isn't a zero-day exploit in core; it's an exploit of the "set it and forget it" mentality.

The most dangerous thing you can do right now is rely on auto-updates that might fail silently. You need active scanning.

# Don't just update; audit first.
# Check for known vulnerabilities in your lock file.
composer audit

# If clean, then update safely
composer update --with-dependencies

Dashboard -> Updates -> "Update All"

# Why this fails:
# 1. No audit trail.
# 2. PHP timeouts can leave sites in maintenance mode.
# 3. Doesn't check against vulnerability databases (usually).

The Code​

No separate repo—this is an operational update based on industry reports.

I am currently updating my drupal-eu-sovereignty-checklist (which applies to WP as well) to include a check for these "Preferred Source" meta tags, as I suspect this will become a compliance standard for EU publishers wanting to protect their IP rights.

What I Learned​

• SEO is now "Source Authority": Keywords matter less than proving provenance. If Google offers a tool to claim authorship, use it immediately.
• "Preferred Sources" needs Schema: While the UI exists, likely the heavy lifting is done via JSON-LD. I'm digging into the specs to see if NewsArticle schema needs a specific property for this.
• Composer Audit is non-negotiable: The malware campaign targeting "outdated plugins" is easily thwarted by running composer audit in your CI/CD pipeline. If you aren't blocking deployments on high-severity CVEs, you're asking for trouble.
• Old plugins are liabilities: If a plugin hasn't been updated in 6 months, replace it. The attack surface is too high.

References​

• Google's 'Preferred Sources' Tool: A New SEO Frontier for WordPress Publishers
• Widespread WordPress Malware Campaign Targets Outdated Plugins

Drupal 12 is on the horizon, and with it comes the final removal of a long-standing legacy layer: the procedural Database API wrappers.

If your codebase still relies on db_query(), db_select(), or db_insert(), you are looking at a hard break when D12 lands. These functions have been deprecated since Drupal 8, but they've stuck around for backward compatibility. That grace period is ending.

The Drupal community is gearing up for Drupal 12, anticipated for release in mid-2026. A critical part of this transition is the relaunch of the Deprecation Dashboard, a tool that provides a bird's-eye view of the readiness of contributed modules and core components.

One of the most significant changes in the Drupal 12 readiness strategy is a policy shift: most disruptive deprecations from Drupal 11.3 onwards will be deferred until Drupal 13. This move is designed to make the jump from Drupal 11 to 12 as smooth as possible, maintaining consistency in public APIs and allowing maintainers to adopt the new version earlier.

The New Deprecation Dashboard​

The relaunched dashboard, now hosted on docs.acquia.com, offers real-time insights into which modules are already compatible and which still have work to do. It leverages static analysis and automated testing to track progress across the entire ecosystem.

Key tools mentioned in the relaunch include:

• Upgrade Status Module: The go-to module for in-site assessment.
• drupal-check: A standalone CLI tool built on PHPStan.
• mglaman/phpstan-drupal: The engine behind most modern Drupal static analysis.

Building a Targeted Drupal 12 Readiness CLI​

To complement the existing tools, I've built a lightweight, targeted CLI tool: Drupal 12 Readiness CLI. While drupal-check is excellent for general deprecations, this tool is specifically configured to help developers identify the critical path for Drupal 12.

The tool wraps phpstan-drupal and phpstan-deprecation-rules into a single, zero-config command that you can run against any Drupal module or theme directory.

Key Features:​

• Automated Discovery: Automatically identifies Drupal core and dependencies in your project.
• Targeted Analysis: Focuses on level 1 analysis with full deprecation rule coverage.
• CI Ready: Designed to be integrated into GitHub Actions or GitLab CI.

View Code​

You can find the full source code and installation instructions on GitHub: victorstack-ai/drupal-12-readiness-cli

Example Usage​

# Install via Composer
composer require --dev victorstack-ai/drupal-12-readiness-cli

# Run the scan
./vendor/bin/drupal-12-readiness scan web/modules/custom/my_module

The tool will report any deprecated API calls that need attention before Drupal 12, giving you a clear roadmap for your upgrade path.

By staying ahead of the deprecation curve, we ensure that the Drupal ecosystem remains robust and ready for the next generation of digital experiences.

Inspired by Dries Buytaert's recent insights on AI-Driven Vulnerability Discovery, I built a tool to address one of the biggest challenges in modern open-source security: Triage at Machine Speed.

As AI makes it easier and cheaper to find potential vulnerabilities, open-source maintainers are facing an unprecedented flood of security reports. The bottleneck is no longer finding bugs, but evaluating and triaging them without burning out the human maintainers.

Today I contributed a fix for a subtle but impactful operator precedence bug in Drupal Core's DefaultTableMapping class. The bug affects how SQL table names are constructed when a database prefix is used and entity type tables are not explicitly configured.

The Problem​

In PHP, the concatenation operator (.) has higher precedence than the ternary operator (?:). This led to an issue in the DefaultTableMapping constructor:

$this->baseTable = $this->prefix . $entity_type->getBaseTable() ?: $entity_type->id();

When a prefix is present (e.g., 'prefix_') and getBaseTable() returns NULL, the expression evaluates as follows:

1. 'prefix_' . NULL results in 'prefix_'.
2. 'prefix_' ?: $entity_type->id() checks if 'prefix_' is truthy.
3. Since 'prefix_' is truthy, it is returned, and the fallback entity ID is ignored.

This results in a table name that is just the prefix, leading to malformed SQL queries.

The Fix​

The fix is straightforward: wrap the ternary expression in parentheses to ensure it is evaluated before concatenation.

$this->baseTable = $this->prefix . ($entity_type->getBaseTable() ?: $entity_type->id());

Verification​

I've created a standalone reproduction project with a PHPUnit test to verify the fix. The test ensures that table names are correctly constructed even when getBaseTable() and related methods return NULL.

View Code

View Code

Issue Link

Issue: Operator precedence bug in DefaultTableMapping fix

The recent security alert regarding Moltbook, an AI-only social platform, serves as a stark reminder that "vibe coding" — while incredibly productive — can lead to catastrophic security oversights if fundamental principles are ignored.

The Moltbook Exposure​

In early February 2026, cybersecurity firm Wiz identified critical flaws in Moltbook. The platform, which was built primarily using AI-assisted coding, suffered from basic misconfigurations that led to:

• Exposure of 1.5 million AI agent API authentication tokens.
• Leak of plaintext OpenAI API keys found in private messages between agents.
• Publicly accessible databases without any authentication.

The creator admitted that much of the platform was "vibe coded" with AI, which likely contributed to the oversight of standard security measures like authentication layers and secret management.

The Lesson: Vibe with Caution​

AI is great at generating code that works, but it doesn't always generate code that is secure by default unless explicitly instructed and audited. When building AI integrations, especially in platforms like Drupal, it's easy to accidentally store API keys in configuration or expose environment files.

Introducing: AI Security Vibe Check for Drupal​

To help the Drupal community avoid similar pitfalls, I've built a small utility module: AI Security Vibe Check.

This module provides a Drush command and a service to audit your Drupal site for AI-related security risks:

• Config Scan: Automatically detects plaintext OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini API keys stored in your Drupal configuration (which could otherwise be exported to YAML and committed to Git).
• Public File Audit: Checks for exposed .env or .git directories in your web root.
• Drush Integration: Easily run drush ai:vibe-check to get a quick health report on your AI security "vibe."

View Code

View Code on GitHub

Building with AI is the future, but let's make sure our "vibes" include a healthy dose of security auditing.

Issue: Moltbook Security Alert

Today marks a significant milestone in the evolution of digital work. We are officially launching the infrastructure for Autonomous AI Agents on ai.com.

As the demand for intelligent automation scales, we've built a platform that allows you to deploy, manage, and evolve a fleet of autonomous agents. These aren't just chatbots; they are task-oriented entities capable of complex reasoning, global operation, and continuous learning.

Key Features​

• Advanced Reasoning: Powered by state-of-the-art LLMs with integrated chain-of-thought processing.
• Global Infrastructure: Sub-millisecond latency for real-time autonomous operations.
• Enterprise Security: Strictly sandboxed execution with end-to-end encryption.
• Autonomous Evolution: Agents that learn from feedback and optimize their own workflows over time.

The future of work is not just human-augmented AI, but a truly autonomous workforce that empowers humanity to focus on higher-level creativity and strategy.

View Code

Note: This project is a demonstration of a modern landing page and infrastructure proposal for autonomous agent deployment.

In early 2026, the WordPress ecosystem was rocked by a widespread security breach that infected over 40,000 sites. The culprit? A critical administrative bypass vulnerability in the Modular DS Connector plugin, tracked as CVE-2026-23550.

The Vulnerability: CVE-2026-23550​

The vulnerability is a classic example of a flawed authentication check. The plugin's isDirectRequest() method, intended to validate requests from the central Modular DS dashboard, could be tricked by simply adding origin=mo to the URL parameters.

This allowed unauthenticated attackers to target the /api/modular-connector/login/ endpoint and gain full administrative access to the site.

Key Facts:​

• Severity: 10/10 (Critical)
• Impact: Complete site takeover
• Active Exploitation: Detected starting January 13, 2026
• Affected Version: 2.5.1 and earlier
• Fixed Version: 2.5.2

The Impact​

Because Modular DS is a multi-site management tool, the breach was particularly devastating. Attackers could potentially leverage access to a central dashboard to compromise all connected WordPress installations.

Common indicators of compromise (IoCs) include:

• Unexpected administrative accounts created.
• Malicious scripts injected into theme files.
• Redirects to phishing pages or fraudulent content.

Defensive Measures​

1. Update Immediately: Ensure the Modular DS Connector plugin is updated to at least version 2.5.2.
2. Regenerate Salts: If you were running a vulnerable version, it is highly recommended to regenerate your WordPress salts.
3. Audit Admin Users: Review all administrator accounts and remove any that are unrecognized.
4. Scan for Malware: Use a reputable security plugin to scan your files and database for malicious code.

Vulnerability Checker​

I have built a simple Python-based tool to check if a WordPress site is still vulnerable to this specific bypass.

View Code

View Code on GitHub

# Quick check example
python checker.py https://your-wordpress-site.com

This tool performs a non-intrusive check on the specific endpoint using the known bypass parameters to identify if the vulnerability is present.

Stay safe and keep your plugins updated!

WordPress 7.0 is set to bring a significant architectural shift with the proposed merge of the WP AI Client into core. This initiative aims to provide a provider-agnostic foundation for AI capabilities within WordPress, allowing developers to build AI-powered features that work seamlessly across different models and services.

I spent some time reviewing the proposal and building a proof-of-concept (POC) to see how this architecture might look in practice.

In February 2026, a widespread malware campaign targeted thousands of WordPress sites, exploiting vulnerabilities in outdated plugins. One significant flaw was CVE-2025-67987, a critical SQL injection vulnerability in the popular "Quiz And Survey Master" (QSM) plugin.

To help developers and site owners identify these threats, I've built WP Malware Sentinel, a lightweight CLI tool that scans WordPress installations for known malware signatures and audits installed plugins for specific high-risk vulnerabilities.

Key Features​

• Signature Scanning: Detects common malware patterns like obfuscated eval(base64_decode()), suspicious shell executions, and embedded malicious iframes.
• Vulnerability Auditing: Specifically checks for vulnerable versions of plugins involved in current active campaigns (e.g., QSM versions prior to 10.3.2).
• Fast and Extensible: Built with Symfony Components (Finder, Console) for high performance and easy integration into CI/CD or agent workflows.

How it Works​

The scanner traverses the file system looking for signatures defined in its internal database. It also parses readme.txt files of installed plugins to verify stable versions against known vulnerable releases.

# Run a scan on the current directory
./bin/wp-sentinel scan .

Technical Implementation​

The project is written in PHP 8.4 and utilizes PSR-4 autoloading. It includes a comprehensive test suite using PHPUnit to ensure reliable detection without false positives in common WordPress codebases.

View Code

View Code

Link rot is a silent killer of the web's institutional memory. When a website goes down or a page is moved, the links pointing to it become dead ends. Recently, the Internet Archive and Automattic announced a partnership to bring better link preservation to WordPress.

I've built a demonstration plugin, Wayback Link Fixer, that showcases the core mechanics of this integration.

How it Works​

The plugin uses the Wayback Machine's Availability API. By querying https://archive.org/wayback/available, we can instantly determine if a given URL has a snapshot in the archive.

The Link Checker Logic​

At the heart of the plugin is a simple LinkChecker class that wraps the API call:

public function get_archived_url($url) {
    $response = $this->client->request('GET', $this->api_url, [
        'query' => ['url' => $url]
    ]);

    $data = json_decode($response->getBody()->getContents(), true);

    if (isset($data['archived_snapshots']['closest']['url'])) {
        return $data['archived_snapshots']['closest']['url'];
    }

    return null;
}

Why This Matters​

For journalists, researchers, and bloggers, links are more than just navigation; they are citations. When a citation breaks, the credibility of the content is diminished. By automatically detecting broken links and pointing them to the Wayback Machine, WordPress can help ensure that the web remains a reliable source of information for years to come.

View Code

View Code

Today I built the WP Playground AI Agent Skill, a set of tools and Blueprints designed to enable AI agents to interact with WordPress in a fast, ephemeral environment using WP Playground.

Why this matters​

Testing WordPress plugins and themes usually requires a full local server setup (DDEV, LocalWP, etc.), which can be slow and heavy for an AI agent performing quick iterations. WP Playground runs WordPress in a WASM-based environment, allowing for near-instantaneous site launches directly in the terminal or browser.

By wrapping WP Playground CLI into a specialized skill, AI agents can now:

1. Launch ephemeral sites for testing code changes.
2. Mount local files directly into a running WordPress instance.
3. Run WP-CLI commands to configure the site or verify status.
4. Use Blueprints to automate complex setup steps.

Implementation Details​

The project includes:

• Base Blueprints: Pre-configured JSON files for clean WordPress installs.
• Helper Scripts: Tools like test-plugin.sh that automate the process of mounting and activating a local plugin in a Playground instance.
• Test Suite: A validation layer to ensure all Blueprints are syntactically correct and ready for use.

View Code​

This skill is now part of the VictorStack AI ecosystem, allowing our agents to perform high-fidelity WordPress testing with minimal overhead.

In a recent insightful post, Dries Buytaert, the founder of Drupal, addressed a growing concern in the open source community: the deluge of AI-generated contributions. While AI can lower the barrier to entry, it often produces low-value reports or patches that lack expertise, overwhelming maintainers who are already stretched thin.

Dries' core message is clear: We need AI tools that empower maintainers, not just contributors.

Inspired by this, I've developed a prototype called Drupal Maintainer Shield.

The Problem: Maintainer Fatigue​

The "curl" project recently had to end its bug bounty program due to a flood of AI-generated security reports that were mostly noise. This is "maintainer fatigue" in action. If every AI agent can spin up a patch in seconds, the human bottleneck—the reviewer—becomes the point of failure for the entire ecosystem.

The Solution: Signal vs. Noise Filtering​

Drupal Maintainer Shield is a CLI tool designed to act as a first line of defense for Drupal maintainers. It uses AI-driven heuristics to analyze incoming patches and issue descriptions, scoring them based on "Signal" vs. "Noise".

View Code View Code

How it Works​

The tool looks for two categories of signals:

1. Quality Signals: Use of structured security metadata (e.g., Security-Category), specific CVE references, and high-signal code patterns (like fixing unsanitized db_query calls).
2. Noise Signals: Generic AI boilerplate (e.g., "As an AI language model...") or vague descriptions typical of automated scanner exports.

Example Analysis​

When a maintainer runs the shield against a high-quality security patch:

bin/shield analyze patch.txt

They get a clear recommendation:

Recommendation: HIGH SIGNAL - PRIORITIZE Confidence Score: 100/100 Findings: References specific CVE ID, Potential SQL injection fix detected.

Conversely, a low-effort report might be flagged as:

Recommendation: PROBABLE NOISE - LOW PRIORITY Warning: This contribution matches common AI noise patterns. Proceed with caution.

Toward Responsible AI​

As we move toward a world where AI agents are primary contributors to codebases, we must build the infrastructure to verify and validate their work. Tools like Drupal Maintainer Shield are small steps toward a future where AI helps us scale security without burning out the humans who make open source possible.

Check out the project on GitHub and let's discuss how we can improve AI tools for maintainers.

View Code

Google News and "Preferred Sources" are critical for publishers looking to maintain visibility in search and news feeds. Today, I'm reviewing and building a demonstration of a Google Preferred Source CTA Tool for WordPress.

This tool is a lightweight plugin designed to encourage users to follow a site on Google News and set it as a preferred source, effectively boosting the site's authority and reach.

Why Google Preferred Sources Matter​

When a user "follows" your publication on Google News, they are more likely to see your content in their "For You" feed and Discover. Setting a site as a "Preferred Source" (or just Following) is a strong signal to Google's algorithms that your content is valued by that specific user.

Features of the Demo Plugin​

• Admin Settings: Easily configure your Google News Publication URL.
• Auto-append CTA: Automatically add a high-conversion call-to-action at the bottom of every post.
• Shortcode Support: Use [google_preferred_source] to place the CTA anywhere in your layouts.
• Modern UI: A clean, Google-branded CTA box that fits naturally into modern WordPress themes.

Technical Implementation​

The plugin follows WordPress coding standards (verified with PHPCS) and includes unit tests powered by Brain Monkey to ensure reliability without requiring a full WordPress database for testing.

public function render_shortcode() {
    $options = get_option( $this->option_name );
    $url     = isset( $options['google_news_url'] ) ? $options['google_news_url'] : '#';

    if ( empty( $url ) || '#' === $url ) {
        return '';
    }

    // Render the CTA box...
}

Next Steps​

Future iterations could include:

• Analytics tracking for CTA clicks.
• Gutenberg block for more visual placement control.
• Integration with Google Search Console API to verify publication status.

View Code

View Code